Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 00:23

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Was Daenerys' downfall inevitable after she left Meereen in Game of Thrones?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
The Apple AirPods Pro and AirPods 4 Drop to the Lowest Prices of the Year for Father's Day - IGN
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Want $8,665 A Year In Passive Income, Invest $25,000 In These High Yield Stocks - 24/7 Wall St.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Nintendo Switch 2 passes JerryRigEverything durability test with one major flaw - Dexerto
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Crypto Bros Celebrate Themselves at Bitcoin’s Most MAGA Convention Yet - Rolling Stone